Start. Prepare glyph data. Create metadata file. Create script file. Create source file. Copyright (c) 2000-2014 by George Williams. See AUTHORS for Contributors. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later with many parts BSD . Please read LICENSE. Based on sources from 11:21 UTC 24-Sep-2017-ML-D. Based on source from git with hash: Cannot find your hotkey definition file! 0u00A0 I'm sorry this file is too complex for me to understand (or is erroneous) 0u00A1 0u00A2 0u00A3 0u00A4 0u00A5 0u00A6 0u00A7 0u00A8 0u00A9 0u00AA 0u00AB 0u00AC 0u00AD 0u00AE 0u00AF 0u00B0 0u00B1 0u00B2 0u00B3 0u00B4 0u00B6 0u00B7 0u00B8 0u00B9 0u00BA 0u00BB 0u00BC 0u00BD 0u00BE 0u00BF 0u00C0 0u00C1 0u00C2 0u00C3 0u00C4 0u00C5 0u00C6 0u00C7 0u00C8 0u00C9 0u00CA 0u00CB 0u00CC 0u00CD 0u00CE 0u00CF 0u00D0 0u00D1 0u00D2 0u00D3 0u00D4 0u00D5 0u00D6 0u00D7 0u00D8 0u00D9 0u00DA 0u00DB 0u00DC 0u00DD 0u00DE 0u00DF 0u00E0 0u00E1 0u00E2 0u00E3 0u00E4 0u00E5 0u00E6 0u00E7 0u00E8 0u00E9 0u00EA 0u00EB 0u00EC 0u00ED 0u00EE 0u00EF 0u00F0 0u00F1 0u00F2 0u00F3 0u00F4 0u00F5 0u00F6 0u00F7 0u00F8 0u00F9 0u00FA 0u00FB 0u00FC 0u00FD 0u00FE 0u00FF 0u0100 0u0101 0u0102 0u0103 0u0104 0u0105 0u0106 0u0107 0u0108 0u0109 0u010C 0u010D 0u010E 0u010F 0u0111 0u0112 0u0113 0u0118 0u0119 0u011A 0u011B 0u011C 0u011D 0u0124 0u0125 0u0127 0u012A 0u012B 0u0134 0u0135 0u0139 0u013A 0u013D 0u013E 0u0141 0u0142 0u0143 0u0144 0u0147 0u0148 0u014B 0u014C 0u014D 0u0150 0u0151 0u0152 0u0153 0u0154 0u0155 0u0158 0u0159 0u015A 0u015B 0u015C 0u015D 0u015E 0u015F 0u0160 0u0161 0u0162 0u0163 0u0164 0u0165 0u016A 0u016B 0u016C 0u016D 0u016E 0u016F 0u0170 0u0171 0u0179 0u017A 0u017B 0u017C 0u017D 0u017E 0u0193 0u01C2 0u01CD 0u01CE 0u01D0 0u01D1 0u01D2 0u01D4 0u01D6 0u01D8 0u01DA 0u01DC 0u01F8 0u01F9 0u01FD 0u0250 0u0251 0u0252 0u0253 0u0254 0u0255 0u0256 0u0257 0u0258 0u0259 0u025A 0u025C 0u025E 0u025F 0u0260 0u0261 0u0264 0u0265 0u0266 0u0267 0u0268 0u026C 0u026D 0u026E 0u026F 0u0270 0u0271 0u0272 0u0273 0u0275 0u0279 0u027A 0u027B 0u027D 0u027E 0u0281 0u0282 0u0283 0u0284 0u0288 0u0289 0u028A 0u028B 0u028C 0u028D 0u028E 0u0290 0u0291 0u0292 0u0294 0u0295 0u0298 0u029D 0u02A1 0u02A2 0u02C7 0u02C8 0u02CC 0u02D0 0u02D1 0u02D8 0u02D9 0u02DB 0u02DD 0u02DE 0u02E5 0u02E6 0u02E7 0u02E8 0u02E9 0u0300 0u0301 0u0302 0u0303 0u0304 0u0306 0u0308 0u030B 0u030C 0u030F 0u0318 0u0319 0u031C 0u031D 0u031E 0u031F 0u0320 0u0324 0u0325 0u0329 0u032A 0u032C 0u032F 0u0330 0u0334 0u0339 0u033A 0u033B 0u033C 0u033D 0u0361 0u0391 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0392 0u0393 0u0394 0u0395 0u0396 0u0397 0u0398 0u0399 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u039F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u03C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0401 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0410 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0411 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0412 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0413 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0414 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0415 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0416 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0417 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0418 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0419 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u041F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0420 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0421 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0422 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0423 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0424 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0425 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0426 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0427 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0428 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0429 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u042F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0430 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0431 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0432 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0433 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0434 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0435 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0436 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0437 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0438 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0439 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u043F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0440 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0441 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0442 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0443 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0444 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0445 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0446 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0447 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0448 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0449 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u044F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u0451 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1E3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1F70 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1F71 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1F72 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u1F73 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2010 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2013 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2014 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2016 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2018 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2019 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u201C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u201D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2020 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2021 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2022 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2025 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2026 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2030 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2032 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2033 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u203B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u203C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u203E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u203F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2047 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2048 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2049 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u20AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2103 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u210F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2113 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2127 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u212B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2135 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2153 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2154 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2155 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2190 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2191 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2192 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2193 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2194 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2196 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2197 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2198 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2199 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u21C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u21D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u21D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u21E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u21E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u21E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u21E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2200 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2202 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2203 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2205 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2207 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2208 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2209 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u220B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2212 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2213 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u221A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u221D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u221E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2220 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2225 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2226 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2227 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2228 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2229 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u222A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u222B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u222C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2234 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2235 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u223D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2243 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2245 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2248 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2252 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2260 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2261 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2262 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2266 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2267 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u226A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u226B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2276 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2277 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2282 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2283 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2284 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2285 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2286 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2287 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u228A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u228B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2295 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2296 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2297 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u22A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u22DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u22DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2305 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2306 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2312 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2318 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u23CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2423 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u24F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u24F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u24F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u24F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u24F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u24FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u24FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u24FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u24FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u24FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2500 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2501 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2502 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2503 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u250C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u250F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2510 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2513 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2514 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2517 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2518 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u251B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u251C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u251D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2520 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2523 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2524 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2525 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2528 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u252B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u252C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u252F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2530 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2533 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2534 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2537 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2538 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u253B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u253C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u253F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2542 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u254B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u25EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2600 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2601 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2602 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2603 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2605 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2606 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u260E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2616 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2617 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2640 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2642 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2660 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2661 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2662 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2663 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2664 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2665 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2666 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2667 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2668 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2669 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u266A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u266B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u266C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u266D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u266E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u266F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2713 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2934 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u2935 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u29BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u29FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u29FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3000 I'm sorry this file is too complex for me to understand (or is erroneous) There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3001 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3002 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3003 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3005 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3006 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3007 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3008 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3009 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u300A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u300B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u300C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u300D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u300E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u300F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3010 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3011 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3012 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3013 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3014 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3015 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3016 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3017 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3018 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3019 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u301C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3020 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3033 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3034 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3035 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u303B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u303C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u303D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3041 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3042 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3043 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3044 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3045 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3046 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3047 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3048 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3049 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u304A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u304B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u304C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u304D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u304E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u304F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3050 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3051 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3052 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3053 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3054 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3055 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3056 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3057 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3058 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3059 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u305A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u305B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u305C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u305D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u305E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u305F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3060 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3061 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3062 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3063 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3064 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3065 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3066 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3067 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3068 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3069 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u306A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u306B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u306C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u306D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u306E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u306F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3070 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3071 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3072 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3073 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3074 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3075 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3076 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3077 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3078 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3079 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u307A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u307B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u307C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u307D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u307E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u307F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3080 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3081 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3082 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3083 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3084 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3085 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3086 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3087 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3088 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3089 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u308A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u308B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u308C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u308D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u308E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u308F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3090 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3091 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3092 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3093 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3094 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3095 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3096 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u309B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u309C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u309D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u309E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u309F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30A0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30A1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30A2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30A3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30A4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30A5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30A6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30A7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30A8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30A9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30AA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30AB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30AC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30AD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30AE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30AF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30B0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30C0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30C1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30C2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30C3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30C4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30C5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30C6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30C7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30C8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30C9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30CA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30CC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30CD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30CE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30CF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30D0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30D1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30D2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30D3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30D4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30D5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30D6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30D7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30D8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30D9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30DA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30DB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30DC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30DD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30DE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30DF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30E0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30E1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30E2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30E3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30E4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30E5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30E6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30E7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30E8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30E9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30EA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30EB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30EC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30ED There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30EE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30EF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u30FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31F0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31F1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31F2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31F3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31F4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31F5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31F6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31F7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31F8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31F9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31FA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31FB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31FC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31FD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31FE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u31FF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3251 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3252 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3253 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3254 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3255 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3256 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3257 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3258 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u3259 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u325A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u325B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u325C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u325D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u325E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u325F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32B1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32B2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32B3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32B4 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32B5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32B6 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32B7 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32B8 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32B9 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32BA There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32BB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32BC There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32BD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32BE There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u32BF There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u33CB There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4E00 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0u4EDD There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFE45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFE46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF01 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF02 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF03 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF04 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF05 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF06 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF07 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF08 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF09 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF0A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF0B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF0C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF0D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF0E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF0F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF10 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF11 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF12 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF13 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF14 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF15 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF16 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF17 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF18 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF19 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF1A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF1B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF1C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF1D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF1E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF1F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF20 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF21 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF22 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF23 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF24 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF25 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF26 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF27 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF28 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF29 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF2A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF2B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF2C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF2D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF2E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF2F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF30 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF31 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF32 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF33 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF34 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF35 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF36 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF37 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF38 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF39 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF3A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF3B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF3C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF3D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF3E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF3F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF40 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF41 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF42 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF43 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF44 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF45 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF46 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF47 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF48 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF49 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF4A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF4B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF4C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF4D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF4E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF4F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF50 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF51 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF52 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF53 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF54 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF55 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF56 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF57 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF58 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF59 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF5A There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF5B There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF5C There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF5D There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF5E There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF5F There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFF60 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFFE0 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFFE1 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFFE2 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFFE3 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. 0uFFE5 There already exists a 'cvt' table, perhaps legacy. FontForge can use it, but can't make any assumptions on values stored there, so generated instructions will be of lower quality. If legacy hinting is to be scrapped, it is suggested to clear the `cvt` and repeat autoinstructing. There exists a 'prep' code incompatible with FontForge's. It can't be guaranteed it will work well. It is suggested to allow FontForge to insert its code and then append user's own. Generate .ttf file. Convert .ttf to XML file. Add xAvgCharWidth data into XML file. Convert XML file to .ttf file. Padding to a 4-byte boundary. Done. Remove temporary files.